Posted On: 2025-November-24
5 Minutes Read
Author: jack frost
A few weeks ago, I jumped into an existing NodeJS project with a tough constraint: no documentation, unfamiliar tech stack, and a four-week delivery deadline. The kind of setup where good engineers quietly panic. But this time, we had AI as part of the workflow.
I went in with zero NodeJS experience. Windsurf (our AI coding assistant) quickly became my guide—not just writing code but explaining the architecture, the patterns, the reasoning behind each file and function. That part was magical. For the first time in a long time, I felt like I could ask deeply technical questions and get clarity in minutes. And at first, I genuinely felt safe with AI. But what happened next is something every engineer needs to hear—because AI productivity is real, but so is AI-induced chaos if you treat it the wrong way.
With Windsurf guiding the unfamiliar NodeJS ecosystem, I pushed the first working commit in under four hours. It felt unreal—correct file locations, proper error handling, sane logic. AI made me 10× fast, and I was fully in the zone.
Edge cases, as expected, gave AI trouble. I had to step in manually. Still fast, still comfortable. I wasn’t worried.
This is the day I started vibe-coding:
I asked the AI to “fetch a list from the database.”
It picked the wrong table.
Even worse: the 45-second pause while it “spun up” was enough time for me to pick up my phone and fully lose context. The tech lead later asked why a page filter had disappeared—and I realized Windsurf had actually asked me for confirmation earlier, but I missed it. The whole day went into fixing this mistake.
A minor merge conflict turned catastrophic.
Why? Because I didn’t know what the AI had changed over the last two hours. I didn't actually understand the branch anymore. I ended up deleting the whole thing and asking AI to rebuild the feature from scratch. Painful.
This is when I finally stopped vibe-coding and started collaborating with AI.
And suddenly, the week stabilized.
AI is not a senior engineer. It is not your cofounder. It is not the voice of truth. AI is a brilliant but inconsistent junior developer. Treat it like one, and your productivity doubles. Treat it like a magician, and your productivity goes deeply negative.
Here’s what actually works:
Small scopes protect you from big disasters.
If something feels off, reset. Branch from a clean base. Or regenerate the feature completely instead of stacking patches.
Atomic tasks = atomic failures = easy recovery.
Speed without verification isn’t productivity. It’s just faster mistakes.
Your workflow should be:
When the AI attempts something risky—refactors, model changes, deletion of logic—require explicit confirmation in your prompts. AI is not consistent enough to be trusted blindly, but it is consistent enough that good process keeps it safe.
Treat the AI as a junior dev whose work has potential but needs guidance:
When the process is tight, the chaos disappears. You still get the speed—just not the whiplash.
Vibe-coding feels good in the moment:
fast responses, fast diffs, fast dopamine.
But the cost is massive:
AI is powerful. But unsupervised power is dangerous. The path to real, stable AI productivity is the same path you use with human teammates:
Small scopes, frequent working commits, full diff reviews, and end-to-end testing.
Follow that, and you can reliably get 2–3× productivity—not the chaotic 10× highs followed by -5× crashes.
copyright © 2026. thehyperanalytics.com